Operated by John-Riley Harper. Dedicated to archiving photography from Utah's underground scenes, as well as other personal projects.

7.05.2012
Stadium of Fire from Above
Halfway up Cascade mountain and the fireworks beneath me register no change at all on my camera's exposure reading. [The photo above shows two or three large fireworks going off as a forest fire (started by fireworks) sends a cloud of smoke into the air.] The city is simply too bright. Its battalion of continuous, 24-7, 360° light sources make the yearly hooha rather ridiculous. Shopping malls clearly outshine the Stadium of Fire. Streams of cars going rapidly from some visual event to another are roughly equal and just as visually impressive as the teeny balls of glittery light.

Fireworks are supposed to stand in for the grandeur and glory of war - the canon boom, missile flare, and exploding shrapnel - but I can clearly hear semis revving over the din. Aren't we past this, as a culture and a nation? What are we trying to prove? Are we simply trying to scare the birds? They have seemed distressed up here. The crickets take no note as far as I can tell.

Maybe it's for the "magic," the twin enchantment and cultural education of our children. I remember loving them early but got bored after just a few years. It was one repetitious affair after another. I was sleepy. It hurt my neck to see every last ember and sparkling source of ooooh. The displays were not anything amazing after two or three times. Kids can be entertained and enchanted, but only temporarily. A rock and a stick, an interactive device, is endlessly fascinating. Fireworks displays turn the sky into a television screen. So it's for the adults, a certain subset of adults for whom this holy day somehow galvanizes. They see it as a necessary indoctrination of patriotism.

I farted on the way down, then realized that I couldn't smell it. All the air smells like flatulence. I look up and notice another mushroom cloud of smoke coming up from Alpine. The fire must still be burning. I hear gangster rap techno blaring and scan with binocs for the offenders below me on the trail. Deer eyes meet mine. Caught in the middle. Through the oscillating darkness, it moves up off the trail and dissipates. It must be terrified and I'm not helping.

Labels: ,

680101693189517657  

0 Comments:


3.11.2011
In search of a Keylogger
I need a good analysis tool for my own keystrokes. I need to be able to see what I have typed. I need it visible on the screen. I want my strokes, also, to be saved to a text file. Unfortunately, tools that do this have been branded keyloggers, a vicious tool used by the unscrupulous, the obsessively stalkish, and the criminal.

Why do keyloggers remain in the murky, hacker-esque shadows of the internet? I am now on my third serious research attempt at finding a good program that can capture keystrokes, and it's the same scary landscape that I've run up against before. Once I had found an excellent tool only to have the idiotic Mccaffe antivirus program detect it as malicious and delete it without my permission. It was a work computer so I didn't have enough access. I could never get it back and now I've forgotten what it even was. :( Oye.

Labels: ,

6203046042514953632  

0 Comments:


8.25.2010
On HDR, Flatness, and Nostalgia
HDR Efex Pro is a new HDR program being pumped and drooled over by the various hype sites I read and drool over. These sites are, of course, set up to whet the lust of people who want to make other people think the images they take are breathtaking, soulful, and moving. Aside from the Kwik-E-Mart name (brainstorming sessions must be grueling), the following line in their promo video annoyed me: "We've been taking pictures of interesting places and they just come out FLAT." What do these brave capitalists mean by the term? FLAT's technical relevance has been consumed by that ever pressing need to find a new synonym for "uncool." It's opposite is the antimonious expression that describes a photo that "pops." What I mean by saying it has no relevant technical associations is actually much worse. What HDR technologies actually do is flatten extreme exposures so that shadows no longer shade and highlights no longer flare and blind. They flatten images! They pop by flattening! Something like a LDR, a low dynamic range image, would be less flat (and possibly "pop" in its own way). The marketers simply know that flat = ugly/drab/boorish, and therefore would never try and argue that it's actually what they are selling. The viewer (you) is welcome to make a judgment before proceeding to the next paragraph.

What HDR technologies really show is that the culture I belong to is afraid of the world, the world in which reality "pops" our pixels out of rational bounds making everything look scary, the photographer untalented, or even a "negative" person! If you make an ugly picture, chances are that you have an ugly outlook on life. Either that or you're inept. When did we become so terrified of the battles within? Beauty for a while was the idea that images brought viewers to a point of understanding the overwhelming, overpowering nature of nature and the closeness of death - they called it sublime. It was, at least, an attempt at reconciling angst. There was an attempt to face the extremes.

Another thing the promo video explains is that you can blend your exposures together it makes them look "more like what you really saw when you took the photo," then proceeds to show cityscapes that look gleaming, vibrant, colorful, and plastic. Although your city may be fine the way it is, the images demonstrate a mild inferiority complex. They announce to the world that you don't live in a shithole. As if! The subtext reads, unfortunately, that you are mildly delusional and live in a world where memory is hijacked by nostalgia, or that your city isn't good enough without teams of programmers prettying it up and hiding any blemish. Beauty now means tamed, submissive and presentable to the parents. Beauty - Bah! I'm tempted to eat a couple boxes of raisins, bags of prunes, and cans of corn and use their software to really "pop" and "make exciting" an HDR mesh of my own diarrhea.

Labels: ,

3838151981020978532  

0 Comments:


9.02.2008
My Backpack has Flown Away
About two weeks ago, while sleeping under the full moon in a canyon, someone broke into my car and took a backpack which contained the cameras that pretty much motivate my life*. When things are stolen from me, as has happened before and will happen again, I always at first give myself a materialist reprimand. What business do I have in emotional attachments to objects? Tom Waits relates, "There's nothing wrong with her a hundred bucks won't fix," and it's essentially the same with me (although a bit more). I read about the depressing decline of marine life and know my problems are so superficial, selfish, and materialistic. So, I really don't want to worry about starting over or anything like that. The time away from a camera will give me some time to think about what I want to do once I rebuild a bit. One positive thing that the loss has showed me is that that people care! I've been astonished by the response from people who actually give a shit about my work. I really never expected anyone to care; perhaps even a few would be happy that I'd stop the ceaseless glassy interjections, tired of being hunted and snapped at. But Molly's response [link] showed me otherwise.

Soon after Molly's comment, others replied with their own concerns and outrage. Courtney replied with poetic, angry sentiments. [link]. Soon Lorraine [link] made her contempt known as well. And then, in a crazy bold move, Nate Hansen, [link] who has been throwing the Easy Street parties, chimed in - not just with outrage - but he set up a Paypal donation account for anyone who wanted to throw dollars at the problem. It's not as if I even REALLY care about the money (of course, money WOULD pretty much solve my situation but I know cash ain't free), the fact that people have taken time out of their lives to care about my own little misfortune has given me more than enough energy to simply say: Rebuild! Go a bit deeper in debt and get a new camera as quick as can be! I'll be back on my feet before I'm missed too much!

Thank you, everyone!


* Particularly, I lost 1 canon 20d, 1 canon 40d, 1 24 1.4l lens, 1 50 1.2 lens, a pocketwizard, two small softboxes, an 8gb compact flash and a couple of 2 gig cards, a bunch of eneloop batteries and bp511s, a brand new pair of prescription sunglasses, and a tan Jeep backpack. Keep your eyes out on the look out!

Labels: ,

5598988085415067652  

0 Comments:


8.13.2008
Uncle Uncanny's at Wind Walker Ranch
Uncle Uncanny's music festival was small enough that you could get around to see everything, but big enough that doing so was more than likely to cause exhaustion, fatigue, and loss of sleep. With larger events you just have to give up and acknowledge that there are more experience available than obtainable, but with this you could perhaps get close. We arrived just after a torrential downpour had made mini-flash floods sweep across the place, but because of the dark and the absorbent desert sand we couldn't see a sign of it. So the earth felt alien and unexplainable to tip-toe across, non-solid and squishy under foot. Music, shadow dancing, and sleep commenced.


Inspired by the wondrous Circus Pandemonium, I set up a trapeze and then proceeded to just about break my neck. After blacking out, waking up, letting the blood dry, and then running into the sunset with my camera in hand, I ended up at a sweat lodge. And this is where my story really begins. I've been to quite a few lodges before and they have usually been free, creative places to express and explore and get to a point where you almost pass out. I love the sounds you can make inside them when you can get everything out of your nose and throat and just have these resonant open air canals. Sometimes there is a bit of mysticism and oddness, but I usually ignore that.

China Blue resident Starman was running the sweat, and to begin he asked if anyone had a song to share or something to say. I was there in part because I wanted to meditate on my neck injury, give it some rest, and "cleanse," so I said that. The person to my right, in a beautiful Irish accent, said that he wanted the lodge experience to help think about how to better know when to assist other people and when to keep silent and stay back, for their own spiritual or experiential growth. I agreed in my mind that this was a challenging boundary to figure out. It butts the ego itself against the instinct to baby others against letting them figure out everything on their own. I felt satisfied that I was in good company.

And then the weirdness began. I wanted to open the conversation up to allow for responses to people's statements. I did not want the dialogue to simply be people on their own soapboxes, so I began talking about how I hoped it would be an environment where people could respond to what others said. The Irishman's response was something like this: criticizing other people meant that you did not accept what they had to say, which meant that you had your own worldview you wanted to spread in the world; the critique of others was the reason why there was so much violence, bloodshed, and war in the world.

I was stunned. I'd always thought that wars are only fought because people do not ask enough questions. The leaders and those in power very love this mindset. People with weak foundations are afraid of being questioned. And then we heard about how the universe was split into two genders, male and female. And then we hear about how humans are beings of light, made of photons. It's ridiculous. You won't find a physicist alive that would agree with that. Regarding gender, it's more social than anything else - and a recent one. To be even looser and say that the universe is divided into sexes - male and female - is just as silly. These are categories based our own view and the fact that most can be easily put into on or another box. It's comes down to one having a large reproductive cell and the other having a smaller one. For much longer than sexual specialization has been going on, life has continued through asexual means. There are all sorts of sexes in the natural world. We shouldn't believe these silly sorts of analyses simply because they make us feel warm and fuzzy inside.

Never let the aura of a situation stop you from calling bullshit!

Labels: , ,

4641550802044470036  

0 Comments:


8.13.2006
Winning the Special Olympics..
I remember a time when it seemed everyone's signature had a picture of a small retarded boy with a face full of glee breaking through the finish line. The text underneath said, "Arguing on the internet is like winning the special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded." Many people have thought this has been one of the more brilliant pieces that the internet has produced. Ironically, the statement is both an argument in itself, and one that has spread prevalently on the internet.

But when I got to thinking about it, I wondered what it would be like to switch the image's argument to something like: "Arguing on the internet is like winning the world Olympics, even if you win, you're still human." The point, of course, is that there isn't that much difference between being limited by a mental retardation and being limitation by our own bodies and minds. Joe Frank once said, "Your cat will never be able to read Plato, your dog will never understand mathematics; why do we think that we would be any less limited?" It's a sad but important perspective.

So, we may be able to make small intellectual developments, but because our mental fluttering can only bring us slightly closer to a limit, what's important in life is not elevation, it's distinction. This is why the hierarchical social world is so important while human evolution is not. We strive for recognition about being a very tiny amount better in a tiny area than someone else. In this sense, there is no real difference in winning the special Olympics, an argument on the internet, or the world Olympics-- only the number people who take note of your superiority to other retards.

Labels: ,

115548719085549577  

0 Comments:


2.23.2006
Outsmart Badguys!
I got the piece below in the UVSC newspaper, but they omitted all of my carefully placed italics, so here it is in full.

Advertisers have never been strict adherents to English grammar, and often intentionally misshape phrases to make them catchier. You may be familiar with Pepsi’s recent slogan, “Drink Pepsi, Everyday,” a spin-off from an older “Toyota, everyday” slogan. Everyday, as one word, is synonymous with commonplace or ordinary. There is a similar phenomenon in our campus halls. Military recruiters sit behind a booth which reads, “Linguists Wanted. Outsmart Badguys!,” as do their t-shirts.

Intentional errors like this have had a lot of success for many reasons. The linguist Geoffrey Nunberg identifies the uproar over Winston cigarettes on release of the jingle, “Winston tastes good like a cigarette should.” It should say “good as a cigarette should.” Nit-picky? Maybe, but they did receive a lot of negative publicity. As any advertiser knows, all publicity is good publicity. Winston furthered the campaign with: “What do you want, good grammar or good taste?” matched by other companies with slogans such as “Us Tareyton smokers would rather fight than switch.” The outrage of pedantic linguists could then put the offense on the front page.

What then is the military’s intent? Might makes right? Are they trying to say they are so desperately in need of linguists that they can scarcely manage a legible ad? However, the recruiters don’t even seem to grasp that “Badguys” should be two words. My comments were met with perplexity. But I can’t believe it was an unintentional error at the top; the grammar was ultimately deliberate. It makes an interesting lesson for the college campus: English class teaches the rules of the English language, because only then can we break them.

Labels: ,

114073848692058927  

0 Comments:


12.20.2004
Thinking Through My Photography
I've been having this continual struggle with camera sizes. Let me clarify: I look through my pictures, and it feels like the ones that have more FEELING were ones I took on my old small shitty cameras, and the one that I'm using right now, even though it makes me feel like a rockstar, lacks the intimacy that you can only get when you don't invade space as much. The fly on the wall, the invisible observer. But then I snap a photo that I fall in love with. So, I think I'll stick with it.

Oh it's such egoism. But maybe not, even if someone else takes a picture with my camera, I feel a strange connection to it. I feel part of it, because maybe I helped set a setting, or I was simply part of the experience. It's this power-tripped control that the photographer has to own the environment around them. I could of course be putting words into people's mouths, but I seriously can't see photographers that don't have an internal struggle going on inside about their 'art', because it REALLY is just stealing the photons from other places and pretending that you did something other than be in a certain place and push a button at a certain time. Remember, all around the earth, billions of people are taking beautiful pictures every second in their minds. The photographer simply publisizes one simple angle, frames it, glorifies it. It's kind of patheticly pedantic, quite unromantic.

But then, something comes along and completely inspires me. Check out this guy: http://www.mariolalich.com. Each and every one of his photographs has been carefully sculpted to make an idea that came out of his MIND, not the environment, manifest. It seems like he spends weeks or whatever time it takes to create one simple image, while I snap like a monkey gone mad, hoping that quantity will ensure quality in the end. And what's piss poor can be fixed more or less in a manifest of photoshop finesse.

Labels: ,

1101535503700762312  

0 Comments:


7.05.2004
Frustration, Fear, Blur, Beating
I've had a horribly unlucky month of taking pictures. Nothing has turned out. I haven't been brave enough to carry the camera around. I start to fear that having a camera around me all the time makes me an appendage to it, or that I annoy people with my ceaseless snapping. But, looking back through my photographs throughout the month, I did find a few that weren't completely blurry and overexposed, and there they are below.

Frustrated, frustrated, frusterated for not being frustrated enough. Frustrated for not having the energy and the inspiration to kindle my frustration into an unholy detonation of mental persperation; to figure out what it means to find out why there's nothing to be furious about after all. All the worlds worst pain is nothingness: which is the worlds worst fear. We cry all our lives, and in spite of understanding, we keep on demanding a better explanation for the frustration of the unending choking machine that dissolves dreams and resolves revolutions to collapse on their knees, roll up their eyes and stop their own hearts from beating.

We've got Lucas Gallup eating kiwi, Cameron Ramey buffing his femininity, Jon-Jon and Kirsti making mystical campfires, kegs, Dj Ethics and Lauren out of their element, Russ Faye looking sexy on The Rock, Nick Tingey smoking, Ion enjoying her dreadlocks, Ion strumming, Crystal Hot Springshot springs, Pride Parades in SLC, Courtney and her Ethan, my miraculous room, Cassie Coombs washing dishes while I drool, some of my dry-erase art, Math Dave writing his math book, and shiners in Magna. Don't forget the 4th of July from up high. I haven't, Misty Quist.

Labels: , ,

3369106861397626541  

0 Comments:


12.02.2003
My Belief(s)
I'm sick of this entry being so long, and I'm cleaning up the site and finding errors, so I instead put this short rant on it's own page. It is basically what you need to accept before ever being able to have an argument with me (and I don't see how if you can't accept the simplicity in the logic, that you can put your own clothes on in the morning). So many people fail to grasp it though! It's simplistic and redundant but if only it weren't.

simle_axiom.html

Labels: ,

6919562861611858436  

0 Comments:


7.03.2003
The Good Book Blazin'
There's a small set of pictures of my mothers recent activities. She has been packing up the house and getting rid of things so she and my step-dad can move to Europe. One of the hardest things about moving is parting with the voluminous amounts of that every household accumulates. She's taken to burning some of her things to complete a memory or simply for pryomananiacal glee. The above is something that wasn't all THAT hard to part with, but burning stuff does feel good.

Labels: ,

2187280084004594788  

0 Comments:


  • Archives: